This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it here.

We at Defamer are committed to fostering constructive, thought-provoking debate. Shortly after posting this morning's item about the seemingly disappointing reality of Jude Law's dangling nanny-bait captured by a paparazzo's lens, some readers wrote in to the defend the naughty actor's member, advancing this crucial discussion through both a contrarian eyewitness account and an imperfect simulation of the controversial photo's conditions:

· "FYI- Jude appeared in a Broadway play with Kathleen Turner called INDISCRETIONS. There was a rather long scene in which he appeared on stage fully nude. While perhaps people are correct in saying he is no Tommy Lee (who is?) he certainly has nothing to be ashamed of. He is very well-endowed. I think the picture just caught him at a bad angle. The camera can lie, but a fifth row orchestra seat can't."


· "I saw the unexpurgated pic of Jude bent forward, nude. Just got out of the shower, dropped my hairbrush on the floor, and halfway back up stopped and saw that my substantial package was as wee as a boy's. When you bend forward, the package draws up — try it in front of a mirror! It's pure hydraulics. That said, we need to GIVE JUDE ANOTHER CHANCE."

Other theories yet to be discussed: Law tucked some of "it" between his legs before pulling on his swimsuit, or that the photographed scene actually depicts Law in the act of checking his pants pockets for a couple of misplaced inches.

Excuse us while we go wash our brain in a tub full of boiling bleach while daydreaming about preseason football.

UPDATE: We can't believe we forgot about "evidence" from our own archive. We must've suppressed those memories.