This image was lost some time after publication, but you can still view it here.

Fed up with reviews that sometimes have little or no basis in reality (is Masa really worth sacrificing your rent? Need we really imagine a Back to the Future scenario to understand Bistro du Vent?), the downtown foodies at Verbose Coma drop the science on Times restaurant critic (and part-time blogger) Frank Bruni:

Frank, your reviews skew snobbish while lacking the crucial information found in, say, your average Time Out quickie. If you re out to rip a place, let us know why. We know you take a gonzo approach, but we want reviews based on merits, not your expectations. Yeah, criticism is a subjective sport, but just because your driver talked too much on the way over to V doesn t make it a one-star restaurant. What s that? It wasn t all you hoped? Well fine. But given the service and the quality of the cuts, it s still at least a three-star place. Hunh? No, no Frank. Three-star is a type of restaurant, not a rating. You ain't Jeffery Lyons. Let us explain, newbie: stars are guides to the levels of service and quality one might expect from all eateries of that type. It s up to the reviewer (that s you) to flesh out the details and tell us if it s a good three-star restaurant. We know that s a lot of work, but you re a big boy.

Food Fight [Verbose Coma]